In Brevard Culmer & Davidson P.A. and Judge John Dean Moxley victimize families, On the 15th of May in 2010 Yvonne Howard abducted the child of 2 parents. The child was hidden for over a half a month. Yvonne Howard then filed a petition for a fraudulent private adoption with the aid of Attorney Scarlett Davidson, a partner in Culmer & Davidson P.A. Yvonne Howard lives at 2203 Greenway Drive in Melbourne Florida. She swore under oath she did not know where the parents were. However, it doesn't take much more than common sense to know she committed perjury. This family was happy until Yvonne Howard was knowingly allowed to perjure belligerently to the court and defy any court orders without the parents having any recourse. It would appear victimizing victims is entertaining to Judge Moxley as whe the victims express their concerns all he does is grin and advocate for the offenders to continue victimizing.
On May 21st she showed up in court, still holding the child for ransom, and stated she had no problems with the father after kidnapping the child and hiding her from him.
On May 21st she also testified she did in fact know her daughter, the mother, lived with her stepfather, Bill Howard, a few blocks away.
This is not the only conflicting statements she made and in fact Attorney Scarlett Davidson Davidson requested if she could testify for Yvonne Howard. The fraud didn't stop there as Attorney Scarlett Davidson being told she couldn't Testify for Yvonne Howard proceeded to fabricating evidence and witness tampering to say the least. This is not the first time Attorney Scarlett Davidson offered false facts and evidence to the court in a suit she previously represented the case was transferred to Federal Court. Attorney Scarlett Davidson was warned by the Federal Court she could not present herself as a Federal Attorney as she wasn't licensed to practice in Federal Court.
Attorney Scarelett Davidson also told the Florida Bar no one was trying to adopt the child despite her client kidnapping the child and filing for a private adoption. What is a private adoption? It is when a private individual files for an adoption without the department of Children and Families. You heard that right, the Department of Children and families reported no abuse, abandonment or neglect was found.
However, the child found as fact to be hidden and prevented contact with her parents by Yvonne Howard was later baker acted and reported that Yvonne Howard was threatening to break her fingers while pulling the 11 year old's hair. Scarlett Davidson then simulated legal process to stop trial before the defense could present their evidence violating due process, Constitutional Rights and Federal Laws.
Although Attorney Scarlett Davidson lied to multiple Judges, also being called out on it by Attorney Ashley Severance, she also lied to the Florida Bar. Judge Moxley was made aware of it and ignored the perjury, fabricating evidence and the tampering with witnesses by both Attorney and client. It appears Judge Moxley sits on a bench of injustice victimizing victims and certifying his approval of murder, sex offenses, abduction and child abuse. Just listen to the 911 tape of the murder here due to Judge Moxley's wild and reckless actions with concealing evidence and abuses of discretion.
Let us review one of the many Florida Bar Rules Attorney Scarlett Davidson has broken multiple times:
(a) False Evidence; Duty to Disclose. A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(4) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. A lawyer may not offer testimony that the lawyer knows to be false in the form of a narrative unless so ordered by the tribunal. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
(b) Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct. A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging, or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
(c) Ex Parte Proceedings. In an ex parte proceeding a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.
(d) Extent of Lawyer‘s Duties. The duties stated in this rule continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 4-1.6.
On May 21st she showed up in court, still holding the child for ransom, and stated she had no problems with the father after kidnapping the child and hiding her from him.
On May 21st she also testified she did in fact know her daughter, the mother, lived with her stepfather, Bill Howard, a few blocks away.
This is not the only conflicting statements she made and in fact Attorney Scarlett Davidson Davidson requested if she could testify for Yvonne Howard. The fraud didn't stop there as Attorney Scarlett Davidson being told she couldn't Testify for Yvonne Howard proceeded to fabricating evidence and witness tampering to say the least. This is not the first time Attorney Scarlett Davidson offered false facts and evidence to the court in a suit she previously represented the case was transferred to Federal Court. Attorney Scarlett Davidson was warned by the Federal Court she could not present herself as a Federal Attorney as she wasn't licensed to practice in Federal Court.
Attorney Scarelett Davidson also told the Florida Bar no one was trying to adopt the child despite her client kidnapping the child and filing for a private adoption. What is a private adoption? It is when a private individual files for an adoption without the department of Children and Families. You heard that right, the Department of Children and families reported no abuse, abandonment or neglect was found.
However, the child found as fact to be hidden and prevented contact with her parents by Yvonne Howard was later baker acted and reported that Yvonne Howard was threatening to break her fingers while pulling the 11 year old's hair. Scarlett Davidson then simulated legal process to stop trial before the defense could present their evidence violating due process, Constitutional Rights and Federal Laws.
Although Attorney Scarlett Davidson lied to multiple Judges, also being called out on it by Attorney Ashley Severance, she also lied to the Florida Bar. Judge Moxley was made aware of it and ignored the perjury, fabricating evidence and the tampering with witnesses by both Attorney and client. It appears Judge Moxley sits on a bench of injustice victimizing victims and certifying his approval of murder, sex offenses, abduction and child abuse. Just listen to the 911 tape of the murder here due to Judge Moxley's wild and reckless actions with concealing evidence and abuses of discretion.
Let us review one of the many Florida Bar Rules Attorney Scarlett Davidson has broken multiple times:
(a) False Evidence; Duty to Disclose. A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;
(3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(4) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. A lawyer may not offer testimony that the lawyer knows to be false in the form of a narrative unless so ordered by the tribunal. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
(b) Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct. A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging, or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
(c) Ex Parte Proceedings. In an ex parte proceeding a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.
(d) Extent of Lawyer‘s Duties. The duties stated in this rule continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 4-1.6.
0 comments:
Post a Comment